What it does
The app opens to a national map of NEON aquatic sites coloured by water type. Tap one to read its bottom-dwelling community, or step back and compare the whole network across a gradient. Each site loads instantly from a per-site data bundle that ships with the app, with no network round-trip. From there it ranks the densest taxa, estimates how many kinds really live there, plots every taxon by how dense and how widespread it is, and traces the clean-water signal over time.
It is built for two audiences: anyone curious about what lives on a stream or lake bottom and what it says about the water, and the field crews and students who want a fast, honest read on a NEON aquatic site.
Highlights
Select-a-site map · A national map of all 34 bundled aquatic sites, coloured by water type (stream, river, lake), with a one-tap load and an accessible list fallback. The demo opens Sycamore Creek, a Sonoran-desert stream near Phoenix.
Taxa Board · Every taxon as a dot: how dense it is (individuals per square metre) against how widespread it is (the share of samples it shows up on). EPT taxa, the clean-water groups, are called out. Tap any dot to pin its card.
The EPT pulse · The clean-water signal over time: each collection bout's share of mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies, alongside density, with the habitat and sampler type carried so you can read what is biology and what is method.
Across the country · Every aquatic site placed on a geographic gradient against its community, coloured by water type. Lakes sit naturally low on the clean-water bugs, which the chart shows plainly. Space-for-time, stated on the chart.
Honest abundance: a density index · Density is individuals per square metre, a within-site index, never a population. Big samples are subsampled and scaled up, so the number is an estimate, and the app says so on every chart.
Diversity, beyond one sample · Richness rarefied to a common count plus a Chao1 estimate of how many kinds really use the site, since sampling misses the rare and the patchy. Suppressed where the count is too small to be honest.
Taxon profile cards · A downloadable card (PNG + CSV) for any taxon: density, how widespread, whether it is EPT, plus clickable site data-quality flags you can download, with a column codebook.
stream / river / lake
three water types
per m²
density, not a count
How we keep it honest
Every chart says how its number was made. When we show how abundant a taxon is, that is a
density (individuals per square metre), not a population, because a benthic sample covers a
known patch of bottom and is then scaled up from the fraction NEON sorted. Comparisons are valid
within one site, within a habitat and a sampler type; different samplers and habitats are not
directly comparable. Counts of how many kinds live at a site are standardized so a bigger sample is
not credited with extra taxa just for being bigger, and they are suppressed where the count is too
small to estimate honestly. The EPT share, the mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies, is a
descriptive clean-water signal, never a pass/fail score, a good/fair/poor rating, or an
aquatic-life-use call: NEON sites have no calibrated reference condition. Lakes are naturally
EPT-poor, so a low share at a lake is the ecosystem, not impairment. When we compare sites across
the country, we are comparing 34 different places watched at the same time, not one place changing,
so the patterns are a starting point for questions, not proof of cause.
This is a tool for learning and exploring. It is not affiliated with NEON, Battelle, or the NSF.